Biblio terminologija, 17. december 2016 ― © 7blog Nekatere druge vrste besednih indeksov so še: KWWC Key-Word-With-Context Index KEYTALPHA Key-Term Alphabetical WADEX Word and Author IndexIt – ena od izpopolnjenih in izboljšanih verzij KWIC-indeksa AKWIC Author and keyword in context index – različica kazala WADEX DKWTC Double KWIC Index – ena od izpopolnjenih in izboljšanih verzij KWIC-indeksa KLIC Key-Letter-In-Context Index Tokratni naslov je za prenekaterega nepoučenega bralca zagotovo nenavaden, enigmatičen in čuden, mogoče bo kdo pomislil, da gre za besedno igro, otroško izštevanko ali brezpomenski refren uspavanke za dojenčka. Pa ni nič od tega. Vse tri besede, gre za angleške kratice, predstavljajo zelo resne, pomembne in zapletene reči. Kadar se uporabljajo vse tri skupaj, si navadno sledijo v zgornjem vrstnem redu (ni pa nujno), kdo ve zakaj, morebiti zato, ker so tako lažje izgovorljive, ali pa zato, ker je prva (KWIC) najpomembnejša in nedvomno najpogostejša. Gre za poimenovanje in opis različne organizacije permutiranih besednih kazal. No, iz teh kratic na srečo ne delamo izpeljank (kot npr. FRBR, FZBZ in še kaj hujšega) in torej ne kwikamo, kwakamo ali kwokamo . . . Učinkovito in kar se da hitro iskanje ter pridobivanje pravih informacij iz velike količine knjig, člankov in drugih dokumentov je bilo že vedno ena od kritičnih točk strokovnega in znanstvenega delovanja, pa seveda temu namenjenih podpornih dejavnosti, to je knjižnic in dokumentacijskih služb. Danes, ko merimo in ocenjujemo iskanje in dostop do relevantnih informacij v sekundah in s številom za to potrebnih klikov, si težko predstavljamo sisteme za poizvedovanje v predračunalniški dobi. Kljub ročni ali "peš tehnologiji" so bili postopki in orodja neverjetno dobri in učinkoviti. V bibliotekarstvu in dokumentalistiki se je kot posebna stroka razvilo indeksiranje, to je označevanje vsebine dokumenta, publikacije z indeksirnimi izrazi, npr. deskriptorji, ključnimi besedami, notacijami določe

Sodobna umetnost (Aljoša Abrahamsberg), 17. december 2016 ― PIXXELPOINT 2016 / WE We. Does this mean the We and the collective You, You and I, or is there also a They, and if so, who does that mean? Goricans, Slovenians, Europeans, Christians, atheists, revolutionaries, mothers, children, families of all types? Are the new arrivals also We, are We the ones staying or are We perhaps the ones departing? Are We those living here and now, or those who have ever lived and ever will? Who is it that we are? And who is it that we can be? Only humans? Are animals included in the concept of We? What about other creatures of the planet, are they also We? Even those that breathe with gills, or those that do not breathe at all? Does We include those beyond the stars, or are those They, or You? What do We have to say to each other? Some months ago I started a process which has been taking form throughout the year. The concentrated sequence of events scheduled during the festival week taking place in December 2016 is only the conclusion of a stage of this process, only an intersection where the paths of all contributors meet, it is a festival, a celebration and an exhibition, a communication exercise via the events, where the visitors will join us. This edition of Pixxelpoint is a particularly long and widespread process, through which I bring together the contributing artists. Artists in collaboration with other artists and art students, scientists and the laboratories and research centers of the University of Nova Gorica, join together with the local community in the research of the specific nature of living on the state border in light of international events, where art, science, society and everyday life meet. Perhaps the key question I ask throughout this process is how we see one another. Not just through art or science, but most of all how all of this helps us to survive, what it means for the destiny of the human being. Of course, by using the title We I find myself thinking about the Zamyatin novel from 1921, asking myself in what